|
|
|
Session Start: Sun Dec 19 12:00:00 1999
|
|
|
***Now talking in #Defib
|
|
|
***Topic is 'Field Theory with a l y r i c m a i l e r participants, Sun. Dec 19, 12pm PST (20:00 GMT)'
|
[12:03] |
Surd |
Welcome to Defib. Let's do introductions.
|
[12:03] |
Surd |
I'm Jim Andrews
|
[12:03] |
Inna |
I'm Inna Kouper
|
[12:03] |
Jim_R |
Jim Rosenberg
|
[12:03] |
Mike |
I'm Mike Kelleher
|
[12:03] |
[brick] |
Dan Waber
|
[12:03] |
Loss |
Loss Glazier
|
[12:03] |
PbN |
I'm Jim Andre... DOH! I'm PbN -- Ted Warnell
|
[12:04] |
tombell |
tom bell
|
[12:04] |
Surd |
And Pluto is anonymous
|
[12:04] |
Surd |
The field project...
|
[12:04] |
Surd |
how do we enter the field?
|
[12:04] |
Surd |
What is it?
|
[12:05] |
Inna |
The definition?
|
[12:05] |
Surd |
I'm just looking for a way in
|
[12:05] |
Surd |
to open up discussion
|
[12:05] |
Loss |
I think it's a range of possibilities within a given set of practices ...
|
[12:05] |
Surd |
into the field
|
[12:05] |
Mike |
When I first came to the web, I thought of it in spatial terms, ie field...
|
[12:06] |
Surd |
What sort of practices, Loss?
|
[12:06] |
|
***Matze has joined #Defib
|
[12:06] |
|
***Matze has quit IRC (QUIT: User exited.)
|
[12:06] |
Inna |
probably, discursive practices...
|
[12:06] |
|
***Loss has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer.)
|
[12:06] |
Surd |
We can have multiple threads going on here too, folks, that's OK...
|
[12:07] |
tombell |
how many dimensions? mike
|
[12:08] |
|
***Loss has joined #Defib
|
[12:08] |
Surd |
What sort of practices, Loss?
|
[12:08] |
Loss |
Wow, even mIRC crashed on me!
|
[12:09] |
Inna |
Go on with your thought, Loss
|
[12:09] |
Surd |
Blip blat blot
|
[12:09] |
Mike |
Well, that's the problem, I don't think you can ask of web objects, where are they? Or not without many problems. Field is open to time I think. Thus, when are they also.
|
[12:09] |
Loss |
I think there are many ways to approach these media.
|
[12:09] |
Loss |
For all of us our understandings are different.
|
[12:09] |
Loss |
Jim_R and I, for example, often discuss different shades of ...
|
[12:09] |
Loss |
interpretation when it comes to hypertext.
|
[12:09] |
Loss |
But this field that Mike and Tom have opened ...
|
[12:10] |
Loss |
I see it as a place that we might be able to interweave ...
|
[12:10] |
Loss |
our ways of approaching these media.
|
[12:10] |
tombell |
i think the project opens up a number of directions
|
[12:10] |
Mike |
But "place" doesn't quite work as metaphor. Where are we?
|
[12:11] |
Surd |
Yes, I liked Jim R's essay about field theory being concerned with the way works can continue and thread or weave... is that accurate, Jim?
|
[12:11] |
Jim_R |
Sure, that works. I guess I have a kind of private axe to grind:
|
[12:11] |
|
***Pau has joined #Defib
|
[12:11] |
|
***Pau has left #Defib
|
[12:11] |
Loss |
We are "here".
|
[12:11] |
Mike |
We are now.
|
[12:12] |
Jim_R |
I've been interested for a long time in getting hypertext into the fine structure of language.
|
[12:12] |
Jim_R |
It just occurs to me that 'field' is a more fine-grained concept that something like 'lexia' ...
|
[12:12] |
Inna |
Lexia is inappropriate
|
[12:13] |
Loss |
Please expand on that, Jim.
|
[12:13] |
Jim_R |
I don't know if I agree with that, Inna. It has problems, but there has to be *something* you see when
|
[12:13] |
Surd |
mike, time=place?
|
[12:13] |
Jim_R |
the mouse is not moving, there's no keyboard input, etc.
|
[12:13] |
Loss |
In what sense do you mean "fine structure of language"
|
[12:13] |
Mike |
Time precedes place, Jim.
|
[12:13] |
Jim_R |
Inside the sentence.
|
[12:14] |
Jim_R |
Gosh, Mike, my idea is to throw time out of the picture altogether! :-)
|
[12:14] |
Mike |
Really! Why?
|
[12:14] |
Jim_R |
I want to put words into the same place, logically and physically. If you do that,
|
[12:15] |
Jim_R |
something has to be unconstrained, and for me that's time.
|
[12:15] |
tombell |
how does the visual dimension fit?
|
[12:16] |
Jim_R |
I see it as the "arena"
|
[12:16] |
Surd |
Jim, you want to put words into the same place as what?
|
[12:16] |
Jim_R |
As each other
|
[12:16] |
Loss |
You are thinking of that in the context of this field project?
|
[12:16] |
Jim_R |
(A cluster of words, one on top of another.)
|
[12:16] |
Inna |
Intergrams?
|
[12:17] |
Jim_R |
Hmm, that's how my writing works, but I haven't figured out how to do that in
|
[12:17] |
Jim_R |
discursive prose, alas.
|
[12:17] |
Jim_R |
Inna: Yeah, Intergrams, and the pieces that followed
|
[12:18] |
Surd |
Is Kac's hologram project related, Jim?
|
[12:18] |
Loss |
In your sense the field would not be something that spreads out in front of you but
|
[12:18] |
Loss |
something that is superimposed?
|
[12:18] |
tombell |
Jim_R, how does the writer/reader perspective relate to that?
|
[12:18] |
Mike |
I guess I don't see the web as having dimensions, except metaphorically...
|
[12:19] |
Mike |
I see it as characterized by movement (forward), more like time..
|
[12:19] |
Jim_R |
Aargh, too much coming at me at once ... I wish I'd been able to see Eduaro's pieces, but all I've seen is
|
[12:19] |
Jim_R |
his writings about them.
|
[12:19] |
Surd |
I mean the simultaneity of different things together.
|
[12:19] |
Jim_R |
Loss, I don't see field as superimposed, but a granularity from inside. "Bonding strength".
|
[12:19] |
Inna |
Field
is something that is compressed and stretches in the readers/writers mind
|
[12:20] |
tombell |
Ive been doing some work with popups and they can open simultaneity and another dimension
|
[12:20] |
Jim_R |
But Mike, why does it have to be linear?
|
[12:21] |
Mike |
It doesn't have to be linear, but progressive, I guess, cumulative
|
[12:21] |
Loss |
But Jim, how do you see its "dimensions"?
|
[12:21] |
Mike |
cumulative
|
[12:21] |
Inna |
If the web doesn't have dimensions, what has it?
|
[12:22] |
Mike |
Inter-
|
[12:22] |
tombell |
horizontal and vertical are dimensions that haven't been explored much in hypertext
|
[12:22] |
Mike |
connection
|
[12:22] |
Mike |
action
|
[12:22] |
PbN |
Inna, maybe it is potential
|
[12:22] |
Mike |
-penetration
|
[12:22] |
Jim_R |
Dimension is a slippery word. I think of dimensions as *independent*. Language space has a
|
[12:22] |
Jim_R |
lot of interdependencies.
|
[12:23] |
Inna |
PbN, you didn't finish...
|
[12:23] |
Jim_R |
Tom, you should look at a paper by Frank Shipman et al on spatial constraints in VIKI, he does talk about
|
[12:23] |
Jim_R |
horizontal and vertical alignments.
|
[12:23] |
PbN |
Yes, it is finished
|
[12:23] |
Surd |
So far we seem to have been examining notions of space in our discussion in relation to 'field'.
|
[12:23] |
Inna |
It seems as if we speak simultaneously
|
[12:24] |
tombell |
is the shipman on the web, jim_r?
|
[12:24] |
Surd |
Metaphorical space, dimensional, the question being what are the dimensions...
|
[12:24] |
Jim_R |
I'll have to find out, I'm not sure at the moment. It was given at Hypertext 99.
|
[12:24] |
Surd |
Yes, like here, now, Inna.
|
[12:25] |
Surd |
If this is a space, then there is a whole lotta simultaneity going on
|
[12:25] |
Surd |
yet various dimensions...
|
[12:25] |
Surd |
This is hard to capture in the canned transcript...
|
[12:25] |
Inna |
How all these dimensions might be percepted
|
[12:25] |
tombell |
right, jim, i'm getting overload again
|
[12:26] |
Surd |
think we have to let it flow, tom
|
[12:26] |
Loss |
The transcript should reflect the simultaneity, I'd think.
|
[12:26] |
[brick] |
and
because there are different lag times between us, what each sees is slightly different
|
[12:26] |
Jim_R |
It's too bad we can't have "graphical chat"!
|
[12:26] |
Inna |
it is like Jim_R Intergrams
|
[12:26] |
[brick] |
on "bad" net days, it's possible to see an answer before a question
|
[12:26] |
PbN |
and this really kind of describes being in cyberspace
|
[12:26] |
Surd |
we cannot capture the whole discussion but enjoy it and focus in on what interests you...
|
[12:27] |
PbN |
time and space seem too obvious -- and dimension
|
[12:27] |
Mike |
Time is very difficult to talk about. The temptation is always to spatialize it....
|
[12:27] |
PbN |
field is a color
|
[12:27] |
PbN |
not green
|
[12:27] |
Inna |
time can not be separated from space
|
[12:27] |
Jim_R |
It seems hard to escape the idea that field is related to *locality*, but I wonder if it helps to be too
|
[12:28] |
Inna |
maybe multicolor
|
[12:28] |
Jim_R |
focused on dimensions.
|
[12:28] |
tombell |
PbN, say more about color, etc.
|
[12:28] |
Loss |
But it's also about our inter-relations, that's the simultaneity.
|
[12:28] |
PbN |
red, blue, FF8D33
|
[12:28] |
Mike |
Field to me is a set of relationships between sites, subjects, scripts determined in and by time..
|
[12:28] |
Loss |
In the project, that is.
|
[12:29] |
tombell |
color
adds an emotional tone? |
[12:29] |
PbN |
Tom,
color or size or interface or something 'mind'... |
[12:29] |
Inna |
absolutely |
[12:29] |
Loss |
Mike,
you mean time as in when people view the pages? |
[12:29] |
Inna |
color
means emotions |
[12:29] |
Mike |
Or
construct or reconstruct them, L |
| |
|