| |
 |
14:00 - 14:30 |
 |
|
|
Surd |
? |
[13:58] |
Djuna |
oh, fyi Bill, the pages I
viewed were static? am I being dumb? did I miss something?) |
|
tompur |
81 . . . also in numerology
you'd add the 8+1 of 81 to make 9 . . . which is a spiritual number
of something? |
|
billseye |
i think i mentioned it in
the first email, but the series is titled "Tao Drops" -- i'm
rewriting the poems in my translation of the Tao Te Ching -- 81 of
them |
[13:59] |
mIEKAL |
what translation are you
working from bill? |
|
billseye |
yes, static, but the
movement takes place in the daily activity of it -- real world
dynamic mark-up? -- a kind of meta-streaming? |
[14:00] |
Djuna |
that's what I find
interesting - the anti-thesis of Toa and the web. nature vs ...
|
|
Surd |
Dynamic, then, in the sense
that you are responding to feedback about the pieces? |
|
billseye |
translation by Gia-Fu Feng
and Jane English (btw, in reaching for the book, i knocked my phone
into the trash can -- hmmmm...) |
|
Djuna |
(hmmm, I wonder what Loa
Tzu would have thought of this age?) |
|
jfk |
sorry, i was disconnected
by my daughter Jacqueline who has accused me of being on too long
|
|
Surd |
I've got that translation,
the book also of photographs, wonderful |
[14:01] |
Surd |
No prob, Joe. |
|
echo |
uhoh..one phone line and
teens? |
|
echo |
:o) |
|
mIEKAL |
homophonic translations are
fun as well, but you'd have to find a version of the tao in
transliterated chinese. |
|
Surd |
Dow vs Tao |
[14:02] |
David |
Nuts. Time has fled.
Thanks, all. Great work, Bill. |
|
billseye |
yes, i'm kinda stealing the
images too and reworking them in Photoshop -- hi again Joe -- or
dynamic in the sense that folks either do or don't respond to them
|
|
Djuna |
exactly what I mean! |
|
billseye |
see ya david -- thanks
|
|
|
*** David has left #defib |
|
echo |
bye david, it was excellent
to read you here |
|
Djuna |
bye |
|
jfk |
adios |
[14:03] |
mIEKAL |
we are participating in a
broadcast this very minute, are we not? |
|
Surd |
yes |
|
Surd |
The text here is animated.
|
|
Surd |
very dynamic |
|
billseye |
also, i'm thinking (re the
Drops) of adding more dynamism and interactivity as i go -- building
speed maybe, and then maybe arcing back down to full-stop |
[14:04] |
jfk |
more like a chat or a
conference call in email |
|
billseye |
yes, miekal, jim and i
chatted pre-show about how this is real-time interactive broadcast,
eh? |
|
Surd |
animated text in the sense
that it is so responsive |
[14:05] |
tompur |
break out the webcams and
we got a party of heads here |
|
mIEKAL |
I was trying to figure out
how we can chat here, & be able to trigger sounds or images
& animations onto the same page, another frame. |
|
jfk |
surd aka JIM...this is
jackie....my computer doesn't seem to work anymore...it won't
connect...help me!! profesh computer man....pps-EVERYONE shop at
shopnow.com thanks ;) |
|
Surd |
there is a person
immediately between each letter |
|
Djuna |
i'm not sure Bill - there's
a remarkable peace (shall we say) within the pages - the first thing
I do these past days when I wake up - part of my 'morning ritual'
|
|
Djuna |
that speaks out of a voice
more eternal (to me) than time bound (as most of my day is) |
|
Surd |
sorry, Jackie, later.
|
[14:06] |
jfk |
yea thanks... |
|
billseye |
wow, Claire, please email
me something along those lines so i can put in the "diary" |
[14:07] |
Djuna |
of course |
|
mIEKAL |
bill, are you looking to
grow the cc list assoicated with the taodrops project, I can
probably give you some more addresses. |
|
billseye |
well, i have about 25
minutes -- anything else anybody wants to talk about? -- let's open
the floor (perhaps even more than it has been!) |
|
mIEKAL |
& it would be neat to
see you putting that thru the poetics list every day. |
|
mIEKAL |
but then you'd have to read
the list (guess you could do digest) |
|
Surd |
And webartery. |
[14:08] |
echo |
i would love to see this!
|
|
billseye |
miekal, yes, PLEASE send
any emails you think would appreciate it -- that's part of the idea!
-- no, NOT poetics... |
|
echo |
memememe! |
|
billseye |
beth, please advance your
email via webartery (or here i guess) |
[14:09] |
echo |
i need all the peace i can
find! |
|
|
*** mIEKAL has quit IRC (Connection reset by
peer.) |
|
echo |
Beth
<emgar@uswest.net> |
[14:10] |
Surd |
I'm sorry we weren't able
to get into the fine critical work you've been doing both at your
site via your essays and at webartery in stimulating great
discussion in furthering the poetics of hypermediated art, Bill.
This medium is perhaps not best suited for that concentratedly
intense reflection... |
|
billseye |
not webartery either,
though i expect a lot on that list will be in the cc field -- i
guess there's something about its going out to "individuals" that i
prefer, ie, as distinct from "mass-mailings" to discussion
lists |
|
billseye |
got it beth! |
|
billseye |
jim, let's talk shop a bit
-- i'm game! |
[14:11] |
echo |
thanks... |
|
Djuna |
moi aussi! |
|
Surd |
You did a piece |
|
Surd |
on memory |
|
Surd |
hypertext |
|
Surd |
and poetry |
|
Surd |
quite a while ago. |
|
Djuna |
bill, I've found your posts
to the list very exciting |
|
Surd |
Tell me about that piece.
|
|
billseye |
claire, l'addresse d'email,
s'il-te-plait... |
[14:12] |
|
*** mIEKAL has joined #defib |
[14:13] |
mIEKAL |
got kicked out again |
|
mIEKAL |
N E BOD E Here? |
|
Djuna |
(oh - I m afraid I don't
speak speak French, just being my poetically pre-tentious self
again...) |
|
billseye |
i was reading this book
(quoted a lot in the essay) on the evolution of consciousness and
"external memory systems" -- it was helpful for me to put hypertext
in that context of "same brain--new machine" -- and also to suggest
a poetics for a more "kinetic" web writing |
[14:14] |
tompur |
moof has been after you as
well, eh miekal? |
|
echo |
yes. bill is going to talk
about a piece on poetry, memory and hypertext |
|
billseye |
claire, no problema,
gracias for "liking posts" |
|
mIEKAL |
which book bill... |
|
Surd |
What was the book again,
Bill? |
|
billseye |
hold on... |
[14:15] |
Surd |
I'm reading the book
Carolyn Guertin suggested called The Art of Memory right now by
Francis Yates. |
|
billseye |
Donald, Merlin. Origins of
the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and
Cognition. Harvard University Press, 1991. |
|
mIEKAL |
thnks |
[14:16] |
Surd |
It seems that the cognitive
changes we might speculate will happen |
|
billseye |
and the essay's at http://www.sunbrella.net/btheater/works/essays/hypertext/expos/exposing.html
|
|
Surd |
via the influence of this
medium |
|
Surd |
are related to matters of
memory and language. |
|
Surd |
Exposing the Nerve |
|
Djuna |
I've been querying
hypertext a lot these past few days - a curious medium as it seems
there are so many varied notions as to what it means/is |
[14:17] |
mIEKAL |
is hypertext the
accumulation of all those notions.. |
|
echo |
reflective of hypertext
itself, claire? |
|
mIEKAL |
can't type, meant to say
isn't hypertext... |
|
Djuna |
I have not read the essay,
Bill, can you give us an abstract (as it were?) |
[14:18] |
Djuna |
summation |
[14:20] |
Djuna |
(damn I wish I'd been more
pre-pared! we should maybe look at these chats as classes we should
be ready for) |
|
Surd |
Yes, you're right. |
[14:21] |
Surd |
I feel that we should
almost reschedule this one, but I might be wrong in reading the
transcript. |
|
billseye |
it oversimplifies a bit,
but i think there's something to the idea that we build "externally"
what we like to do "internally" (biologically, physiologically,
pyschologically) -- hypertext as linked nodes builds an "association
machine" -- i think the "Nerve" essay was basically an attempt to
demystify and demythify the "new" in hypertext theory of early 90's
|
|
billseye |
what do you mean, jim --
why? |
[14:23] |
Surd |
I'm not sure there's a
followable or coherent view to your work, Bill, via the total
diffusion of the conversation. But I'm not sure about this, the
transcript will be a different experience. |
|
Djuna |
ah - but if you look at
such things as the recent forum at Poets & Writers, that BAD
/New mystery/warning still pervades practitioners (writers) - even
those versed in the web |
|
mIEKAL |
I think this forum would
have to be moderated to have that kind of focus. |
[14:24] |
Surd |
Yes, Bill |
|
Surd |
you've been doing |
|
Surd |
interesting work |
|
Surd |
in relating |
|
Surd |
previous poetics |
|
Surd |
to current developments.
|
|
Surd |
Is that what you mean?
|
[14:25] |
Djuna |
and your summation above
seems to still be needed by many - and you're right, actually, it
does seem to be a rather natural progression |
|
billseye |
agree with miekal -- i feel
we've touched on a lot of things and started things off -- good
experience |
[14:26] |
Djuna |
as hypertext can simulate
the creative/thought processes more than the page as the mind is
always working on a lot of different levels simultaneously |
|
billseye |
yes, jim, i want to see in
what ways the new work evolutionizes the old -- but also lately
don't want to restrict myself that way either -- but my experience
is in 20th c. a-g poetics, so i start from there and see where it
leads |
[14:27] |
mIEKAL |
claire when I read books I
have 6 or 8 open at one time, I rarely read a book cover to cover.
|
|
Surd |
Same here. |
|
billseye |
yeah, have you folks seen
pictures of Ramelli's reading wheel?! |
|
mIEKAL |
hypertext seems to be about
the way we've always read... |
|
Djuna |
Ah mIEKEL - I'm not the
only one (thought I was too disorganized) |
[14:28] |
mIEKAL |
that's a great photo bill
|
|
echo |
i wonder how many of us do
that, and if it has changed since reading hypertext? |
|
echo |
ahhh! |
|
billseye |
i've always had a few going
at once too -- now i'm too busing doing web stuff to have anything
open (except my browser!) :) |
|
echo |
it's just the way we have
always read |
|
jfk |
bill, you write: "The
question for poetry has been: Does electronic hypertext offer a new
methodology for writing, or simply a new medium for the practice of
familiar methodologies? To consider language as motility (the
potential to place or replace) revises the question: How do words
behave in on and offline space, and how do we construct a
methodology that comprehends practice in both domains? " Do you
really want a methodology to comprehend? |
|
|
|